Building the future of
power systems modelling

WHO WE ARE

We are a London-based energy software company building the next generation of power market modelling tools. Alongside our advisory work, we develop Convexity: a modern platform used by energy analysts, traders, planners and researchers to model, stress-test and optimise power systems.

OUR OFFERING

Software, implementation, and insights.

Software

Convexity is our flagship power modelling platform with built-in data integrations and workflow automation for energy analysts, traders, and planners.

Implementation

Forward-deployed engineering to help you get the most out of Convexity—from initial setup and training to custom integrations and ongoing support.

Insights

Bespoke analysis and research projects tailored to your needs—market studies, scenario modelling, and strategic advisory based on client requests.

Global experience

Our team has global power systems experience, analysing generation, storage, transmission and distribution systems. We have conducted analyses such as capacity expansion planning, market modelling and simulation, load flow analysis, and resource adequacy assessments.

20+

Countries

50+

Projects and analyses

Drag, zoom and hover to explore where we've worked

What Our Partners Say

Ashvin Dayal

Senior Vice President (Power & Climate), Rockefeller Foundation

The Rockefeller Foundation released a report on the role of nuclear energy in scaling clean power in emerging markets […] nuclear – including next-generation SMRs – could deliver up to 30% of electricity generation and lower system costs by up to 31% by 2050. Kudos to my colleagues […] and the team at Bayesian Energy for being such great partners.

Giannis Vrochidis

Energy Systems Modeller, E4SMA

I am really impressed with how quickly [Bayesian Energy's] Convexity accelerated our work. We were impressed with how much quicker and smoother we could work with in-built scenario handling and visualisations.

Richard Ollington

Managing Partner, Emys Energy

The Bayesian team was pragmatic and professional, acting as true partners throughout the project. Their Convexity tool was exceptional, bringing data to life and rapidly adapting to evolving project needs.

INTRODUCING

Convexity

The alternative to outdated and opaque modelling software.

2

Networks

Directory

Loading map…
7%
Comments
Open
MH
Mark Hammond3h
Chart · curtailment_by_bus

Wind curtailment looks high in the base case, mostly in the northwest (buses C, F, H1). Is the SNSP_Constraint binding? @Aman Majid

AM
Aman Majid2h

Probably — SNSP is set to 75%. @Convexity what share of hours does the SNSP constraint bind, and where is the curtailment concentrated?

Convexity
Convexity2h

With 5.5 GW of wind on the system, the SNSP_Constraint (75%) binds in 163 of 744 hours (22%). Curtailment totals ~118 GWh this January, 74% of it at buses F, H1 and C, where transmission east to bus J is the limiting corridor.

AC
Angus Clark1h

Worth comparing against the Transmission Upgrade scenario then. @Convexity can you run that comparison?

Convexity
Convexity1h

In the Transmission Upgrade scenario (internal limits relaxed), curtailment falls from ~118 GWh to ~21 GWh and gas generation drops 5.4%. System cost is £3.2m lower over the month. Full comparison in the run log.

👍2
MH
Mark Hammond45m

Great, that makes the case for the reinforcement. Resolving.

AC
Angus Clark1d
Map · Generator · Ardnacrusha 1

Should Ardnacrusha be running flat out all month?

AM
Aman Majid1d

Yes — it's run-of-river hydro with ~0 marginal cost, so it dispatches whenever water is available. Expected.

AM
Reply…